Friday, May 27, 2011

Be prepared for any monsoon disaster, states asked

Be prepared for any monsoon disaster, states asked

By IANS,

New Delhi: Amid likelihood of monsoon to touch India at this month-end, the government Thursday sounded an alert and asked states to be prepared to tackle any possible disaster in the wake of floods triggered by heavy rains.

Another advice from Home Secretary G.K. Pillai for the state governments was to keep a close vigil on human traffickers who abduct those affected, particularly children, left vulnerable after devastating floods to work as bricklayers, domestic servants and even sold as brides.

Pillai, at the day-long conference on disaster management ahead of monsoon, "warned that human trafficking gangs become very active during all disasters and there was a need to monitor their activities".

The home ministry had organised the annual conference to review the status of preparedness of the states and union territories for southwest monsoon.

Pillai, in his address, emphasised the importance of disaster and its management in view of its rising trend and with climate change impacting health, agriculture and habitat of different species.

Speaking about the preparedness and mitigation measures, he pointed out that amendment of building bylaws as per vulnerability index of the states was "the key priority area and there was an urgent need to prepare for disaster scenarios through regular mock drills and exercises".

Secretary, border management, A.E. Ahmed in his address focused on hazard scenarios and impact coupled with climate change aspects.

He also asked the state representatives to prepare and forward consolidated memoranda for central assistance in case of disasters of severe nature.

"The states needed to gear up their machinery for coordination with all stakeholders engaged in disaster related activities and to follow the checklists issued by (the ministry) for better preparedness," Ahmed said

Source :- http://twocircles.net/2011may26/be_prepared_any_monsoon_disaster_states_asked.html+

http://cdrn.org.in/show.detail.asp?id=21834

Don't forget about the Christchurch earthquake: Lessons learned from disaster

Don't forget about the Christchurch earthquake: Lessons learned from disaster

In the aftermath of the devastating magnitude-9.0 earthquake and tsunami that struck the Tohoku region of Japan on March 11, attention quickly turned away from a much smaller, but also highly destructive earthquake that struck the city of Christchurch, New Zealand, just a few weeks earlier, on Feb. 22. Both events are stark reminders of human vulnerability to natural disasters and provide a harsh reality check: Even technologically advanced countries with modern building codes are not immune from earthquake disasters. The Christchurch earthquake carried an additional message: Urban devastation can be triggered even by moderate-sized earthquakes.

The Oxford Terrace Baptist Church was damaged in the Christchurch earthquake.

©Schwede66, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported

As seismologists and engineers sort through the aftermath of Christchurch’s earthquake, they are already revealing some crucial lessons that might help us learn how to better prepare for such urban earthquakes. The magnitude-6.1 Christchurch earthquake was dwarfed by the Japan earthquake, which carried some 22,000 times more energy. It was even overshadowed by the much larger magnitude-7.0 earthquake that struck just 45 kilometers away from Christchurch on Sept. 3, 2010 (the Christchurch quake is widely considered to be an aftershock of the September quake). Nonetheless, the Christchurch event inflicted considerable damage: It killed nearly 200 people and caused more than $12 billion in losses (the September quake didn’t kill anyone and caused only a quarter of the damage). The damage was far greater than would have initially been expected for an event of this size.

Why? The damage was considerable because the earthquake originated only six kilometers from Christchurch’s population center and parts of Christchurch’s urban area were as close as one kilometer from the fault rupture. Its relatively shallow depth (only 5 kilometers beneath Earth’s surface) produced extraordinarily strong shaking at the surface. The earthquake occurred at about 1 p.m. on a busy workday, so many more people were in downtown Christchurch and thus exposed to the hazards of collapsing tall buildings; half the deaths from this earthquake occurred when one building collapsed. Finally, the effects of the seismic vibrations were probably amplified by the thick sedimentary layers on which the city is built.

Early reports from Christchurch found patterns of damage that are familiar to seismic engineers: the destruction of older, unreinforced masonry structures (like the Christchurch Cathedral) and the collapse of a handful of high-rise buildings that were built prior to modern seismic engineering standards. But it also appears that there were ground accelerations recorded in the Christchurch area that exceeded the design specifications of more recent buildings. Furthermore, there are clear indications of earthquake-induced liquefaction, or ground failure, and flooding that exacerbated impacts and hampered disaster response.

Earthquakes the size of Christchurch’s temblor occur globally about 100 times per year, or a couple of times each week; statistical analysis of the earthquake record indicates that for every magnitude-9.0 Tohoku-sized earthquake, there are about 1,000 Christchurch-sized earthquakes of magnitude 6.0. Fortunately, most of the moderate earthquakes don’t wind up in newspaper headlines. They occur in remote, unpopulated areas, are under water, or are deep enough that they don’t produce significant societal impacts. As the Christchurch earthquake demonstrated, however, when one of these events takes place close to a populated area, its effects can be devastating.

Many urban planners in the U.S. are appropriately concerned about the potential occurrence of a Christchurch-type earthquake — a relatively moderate magnitude-6.0 to -6.5 earthquake — directly beneath an American city.

Many American cities are vulnerable to damage in much the same way as Christchurch. A number of U.S. cities — notably Charleston, Memphis, Los Angeles, Portland, Salt Lake City, San Francisco and Seattle — are built dangerously close to known faults that have produced large earthquakes in the past, and their growing urban population centers are encroaching on hazardous areas. Most of our cities situated in seismic zones — particularly those in the central and eastern U.S. — have a large inventory of old, unreinforced masonry structures that are subject to damage or collapse, even from moderate earthquakes. And even more recent buildings constructed in the 1960s and early 1970s were built without seismic-resistant design.

Furthermore, the ground beneath many of our cities is underlain by unconsolidated sediments and thus is subject to seismic wave amplification and liquefaction. Add in the vulnerability of critical facilities — such as dams, nuclear power plants and chemical storage facilities — to the cascading secondary effects of earthquakes, including strong ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, tsunamis and flooding, and you have the makings of a disaster.

Earth scientists understand that earthquakes are an inevitable consequence of geological processes, but we also know that earthquake disasters are not. Renowned 20th century author Will Durant wrote in “The Story of Civilization”: “Civilization exists by geological consent, subject to change without notice.” If we are to address his prophetic challenge, we must seek innovative ways to help prepare for and mitigate the urban disaster that is likely to happen during our lifetimes.

That disaster is most likely to manifest itself, not in the form of a massive, Tohoku-style earthquake, but as a moderate-sized Christchurch-style event, in which its proximity to an urban center results in damage far out of proportion to its size. While we cannot forecast which city will be the next victim of such an earthquake, we can mitigate potential impacts. For the most part, we already know what needs to be done. Now the challenge is transforming this geoscience knowledge into action. Let’s not be caught unaware — or unprepared.

Michael W. Hamburger and Walter D. Mooney

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Cities "urgently need protection" from disaster

United Nations Deputy Secretary-General says cities "urgently need protection" from disaster; local government action is crucial

Geneva, 20 May -- After announcing last week that Geneva would take part in the United Nations "Making Cities Resilient" campaign, Pierre Maudet, the incoming Mayor of Geneva as of 1 June, said the city would share experiences with other local governments seeking to manage risk.

Mr. Maudet made that comment at a meeting convened by the United Nations secretariat for the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), attended by United Nations Deputy Secretary-General Asha Rose Migiro and nearly 30 mayors and local government officials.

In her statement to the group, Deputy Secretary-General Migiro said local governments played a crucial role in getting citizens prepared to face natural hazards: "As local officials, you are on the front lines. You cannot wait for national authorities to catch up. You have to act now."

Later, Ms. Migiro commended the Making Cities Resilient campaign for signing more than 600 local governments, but noted, "It was just a small fraction of the number of cities that we need on board. Already more than half the world’s population lives in urban areas. They urgently need protection."

At the Global Platform, the group of Mayors and local government officials agreed on a Mayors Statement, which was presented at the closing session of the 2011 Global Platform, where they announced their commitment to integrate disaster risk reduction and resilience building in planning, awareness raising and investment decisions for their respective cities. Among other things, they also agreed to work with the private sector to promote legal frameworks and proportionate budget increases aimed at strengthening capacities for resilience at the local government level through strategic spatial and territorial planning, land-use, and development programming.

Also on 11 May, several cities joined the Making Cities Resilient campaign aside from Geneva, including: Aqaba, Jordan; Dakar, Senegal; Madrid, Spain; Nadi, Fiji; Portmore, Jamaica; Tevragh Zeina, Mauritania; and the State of Tyrol, Austria.

On the same day, eight cities were named "Role Model Cities" for the Making Cities Resilient campaign: Bhubaneswar, India; Chengdu, China; Mumbai, India; North Vancouver, Canada; Saint Louis, Senegal; Santa Fe, Argentina; Santa Tecla, El Salvador; and Venice, Italy. Campaign Role Models commit to actively share their experiences and knowledge with local governments participating in the campaign.

The Campaign identified a new Champion from the Caribbean, Keith Hinds, Mayor of Portmore, Jamaica, who pledged to promote the campaign goals and disaster risk reduction at local level in the Caribbean, and announced that Portmore would host the national campaign launch for Jamaica later in the year.

The meeting was presided by David Cadman, Vice Mayor of North Vancouver and President of ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability.

Makati named 'Role Model City' in U.N. campaign for resilient cities


Makati named 'Role Model City' in U.N. campaign for resilient cities

by Jerome Carlo R. Paunan

MAKATI CITY, May 18 (PIA) -- The United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) has named Makati a "Role Model City" for implementing green initiatives and disaster risk reduction policies.

The city, being at the forefront of sustainable development, has also received recognition from other international organizations like the World Bank for formulating means to address the effects of climate change.

Aside from the energy-efficient, electric-powered jeepney now plying villages in Makati, the city government also boasts of its solid waste management program and urban-greening project.

Likewise, the Makati City Disaster Coordinating Council and the Makati City Environmental Protection Council were also created to address the need for disaster risk reduction programs and to achieve sustainable development.

Makati Mayor Jejomar Erwin S. Binay said the recognition came as a "pleasant surprise" to the city government since, "it was their duty as public servants to exhaust all possible means to minimize the impact of disasters on the lives and properties of city residents and other stakeholders."

“We have been enthusiastic in creating and implementing resiliency measures to soften the impact of disasters on the lives and properties of our people, and all stakeholders of the city, simply because it is the right thing to do,” the mayor said in an article posted on Makati's website.

The awarding ceremony was part of the 50th founding anniversary of Plan International Inc., a partner of UNISDR in its resilient cities campaign also engaged in humanitarian efforts to promote children’s rights.

Binay also said it seemed providential that Makati has received such distinction as it hosted the United Nations Disaster Assessment and Coordination (UNDAC) Refresher Course since Monday until May 20.

The city government is hosting the UNDAC Refresher Course, the first to be held in the country, in partnership with the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in Geneva.

The Refresher Course aims to update UNDAC regional teams on the latest methodologies on team deployment and mobilizations, developments in humanitarian response system, as well as enhance the practical skills in the use of UNDAC mission kit. This includes software applications, GPS and satellite phones, and team building among UNDAC members.

At a dinner held at the Dusit Thani Hotel Monday, Binay welcomed over 60 local and foreign participants and 13 OCHA facilitators and presenters led by Terje Skavdal, secretary of Field Coordination Support Section (FCSS) of OCHA, and Arjun Kartoch, head of the Emergency Services Branch.

Meanwhile, the workshop topics for May 17 include Disaster Management in Makati, UNDAC’s role in Initial and Rapid Assessments: An Introduction to NATP Methodology and Tools, and UNDAC Mission Statement.

On May 18, the lectures will focus on UNDAC in Earthquake Response and International USAR Teams, Pre-Mission-Familiarization with INSARAG (International Search and Rescue Advisory Group), UNDAC establishment of the RDC and OSOCC (On-Site Operations Coordination Center). A simulation exercise with Major Jun Binay acting as incident commander in a disaster exercise will be conducted by OCHA.

On May 19, discussions will center on USAR Coordination in an Earthquake,

Addressing the Parallel Humanitarian Response, and Addressing the UNOCHA requirements in earthquake responses.

On the last day, May 20, the participants will be briefed on new security guidelines, exit and hand-over strategy,end of mission report, after which they will go on an Ayala Museum tour.

OCHA is the part of the United Nations Secretariat responsible for bringing together humanitarian actors to ensure a coherent response to emergencies. OCHA also ensures there is a framework within which each actor can contribute to the overall response effort.

The city government of Makati has partnered with foreign governments and agencies and local institutions in order to expand awareness and knowledge on disaster resiliency not only in Metro Manila but in the country as well.

“We know we do not have the luxury of time: weather anomalies and natural disasters seem to be happening with increasing frequency and ferocity around the world,” Binay said. (RJB/JCP-PIA NCR)


Source : - http://cdrn.org.in/show.detail.asp?id=21800

Grassroot innovations draw India Inc

Grassroot innovations draw India Inc
Business Standard: May 23, 2011

Mumbai/ Ahmedabad: While so far the National Innovation Foundation (NIF) spearheaded innovations at grassroots level, the organisation is now getting a sound support from India Inc. With word spreading around about interesting innovations being discovered from across the country, corporates are queueing up at NIF to for commercial and social tie-ups.

While the likes of Future Group and Britannia intend to brand and market such grassroots innovations in food products discovered by NIF, power equipment company Alstom is joining hands with NIF for pilot projects in low-cost windmills.

For instance, retail giant Future Group recently unveiled Nutraceutical Cookies, developed by three tribal women innovators from Panchmahal in Gujarat. The products have been unveiled by Future Group in association with National Innovation Foundation (NIF) under the aegis of their 'Khoj lab- India ka Idea' initiative. With a memorandum of understanding (MoU) being signed between them in December 2010, the tie-up will result in more such launches in the coming months, said Future Group.

The patented cookies are made from natural ingredients under the four categories of Anaj, Cornif, Kodri and Farari, and are rich in calcium, protein, omega 3 fatty acids, dietary fibre, phosphorus and iron, its bio-active and antioxidant compounds. The cookies will be available in two pack sizes of 100 grams and 200 grams at all Big Bazaar and Food Bazaar stores. Starting with the six Big Bazaar outlets in Ahmedabad, the product will be sold in across Big bazaar outlets in India soon.

According to Anil Gupta, executive vice chairman at NIF, the organisation is also in talks with another FMCG major Britannia for a similar tie-up. "While we have been promoting grassroots innovations since sometime, it is now that they are seeing us mainstream. What makes our innovations different is that we try to sell by people and not to people. It is a positive sign to see many corporates showing interest in our grassroots innovation," said Gupta.

Apart from retail and FMCG, NIF is also in talks with corporates for commercial or social tie-ups in verticals like automobile, food and food processing, technology, agriculture, energy and transport.On the social front, Alstom Foundation has extended financial support of 56000 euros (Rs 35.68 lakhs approx.) to Grassroots Innovation Augmentation Network (GIAN) and NIF for setting up 50 low-cost windmills for irrigation in salt farming areas of Little Rann of Kutch in Gujarat. "The low-cost windmills are an innovation by two brothers from Assam which was identified by NIF. GIAN has been adding value to the innovation and helping the innovators make it more commercially viable. This green technology will help cut the diesel expenses and labour by 40 percent and 18 windmills have already been installed for the same. Among corporates, Alstom Foundation, the CSR wing of Alstom Group has shown interest in supporting use of low-cost windmills for irrigation in salt farming in Gujarat," said Mahesh Patel, chief innovation manager, GIAN.

GIAN and NIF are planning to set up in all 130 windmills in the near future in three phases and hope to see more corporate support for the same.

Source :- http://www.ibef.org/artdisplay.aspx?tdy=1&cat_id=60&art_id=28828&utm_source=newsalert_05_2011&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=IBEF_23

http://cdrn.org.in/show.detail.asp?id=21802

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Barclays (LON:BARC) publishes Citizenship Report 2010

Barclays Citizenship Report 2010

2010 marked the eleventh year that Barclays has reported on its environmental and social performance and, for the first time, the Report has been published online alongside the Annual Report. The Report has been independently assured by Ernst & Young and meets the requirements of a Type 2 assurance engagement as defined by AA1000AS.

Highlights include:

Extended £43bn in gross new lending to households and businesses in the UK alone, including £7.5bn from the acquisition of Standard Life Bank
Supported 106,000 business start-ups in the UK - an increase of 12 per cent over 2009 and the highest number since 2003
Invested more than £55m in the communities where Barclays operates
Engaged 62,000 colleagues in volunteering, regular giving and fundraising activities
Launched new Climate Action Programme 2011-2015
Involved in £7bn worth of transactions in the clean energy and clean technology sector globally
Committed £1bn over the next four years to improving the customer experience
Achieved an 80 per cent overall score in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index
Ranked sixth in the global financial sector in the Global 500 Carbon Disclosure Leadership Index report and achieved an A rating in the inaugural Carbon Performance Leadership Index

Barclays, which has reported against the G3 indicator protocols and its Financial Sector Supplement since 2007, is a major global financial services provider engaged in retail banking, credit cards, corporate and investment banking, and wealth management with an extensive international presence.

Citizenship is one of Barclays four execution priorities. Chief Executive Bob Diamond said: “Citizenship is not peripheral to our business, but rather lies at the heart of what we do - which is to employ Barclays unique resources, expertise and people to support our customers, clients and communities.”

To provide feedback on this report, please visitwww.barclaysannualreports.com/ar2010/index.asp?pageid=92 or emailsustainability@barclays.com

Situation Report-Hailstorm at Gajole,Malda-West Bengal

State Inter Agency Group, West Bengal

United for Humanitarian Response

Sitrep 1: Gajole, Malda, West Bengal – Hailstorm

16 May 2011, 1300 hrs

Highlight

  • 1572 persons from 25 villages were affected when a localized hailstrom struck
3 Gram Panchayats of Gajole Block in Malda, viz. Gajole I, Alall, and Korkoch
on 15th May, 2011. The control room reports have confirmed full damage to
193 houses and partial damage to 57 houses in Gajole. The reported loss of
cattle is 24 and there was crop damage to 200 hectares.
  • 193 families from Gajole are in temporary relief shelter.
  • There is also a report of 6 injured persons.
  • The storm also affected Jayhat Gram Panchayat of Itahar Block of North
  • Dinajpur.There is a report of blown off roofs, extensive crop damage and cattle deaths.

Response

  • The block administration has already distributed 270 tarpaulins, 250 pieces each of dhoti, saree, lungi and children’s garments and 200 pieces of salwar kameezes, 22 quintals of Special G.R. of rice, 2 quintals of beaten rice and 50 kg molasses for the benefit of the affected.
  • The injured are being treated in Block and District hospitals of Uttar Dinajpur.
  • Nutritional and health needs of the families left homeless require to be monitored.

Sources:

1. State Control Room

2. World Vision India

3. Malda Sahayogita Samity

Prepared by:

Debadrita Sengupta; State Coordinator; State IAG-WB; +91 98300 23649

Thursday, May 12, 2011

“Natural Hazards, UnNatural Disasters: The Economics of Effective Prevention”

“Natural Hazards, UnNatural Disasters: The Economics of Effective Prevention”

  • Date:11 May 2011
  • Geneva
Geneva, May 11, 2011 — On the two-month anniversary of the devastating earthquake and tsunami in Japan, experts from around the globe convened for a special event to present findings from the joint World Bank-United Nations report Natural Hazards, UnNatural Disasters: the Economics of Effective Prevention—as part of the Third Session of the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN ISDR) Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction.

With images of the devastating earthquake and tsunami in Japan still able to shock with their power, the report could not be more timely. Even more so because the number of people exposed to storms and earthquakes in large cities could double to 1.5 billion by 2050.

Earthquakes, droughts, floods, and storms are natural hazards, but excessive death and damage is unnatural –the result of human failure to act. Every disaster is unique, but each exposes weakness in preparedness and prevention, by governments and by people themselves.

“A deeper questioning of what happened, and why, could prevent a repetition of disasters,” says the report, a two-year collaboration of climate scientists, economists, geographers, political scientists and psychologists.

What does effective prevention look like?

Information is key to prevent disasters effectively, as Vanessa Rosales Ardón, President of the National Commission for Risk Prevention and Emergency Response in Costa Rica, explained at the event: . “We have learned in Costa Rica that we must understand the risks we face and prepare accordingly,” Rosales Ardón said. “Undertaking hazard modeling and mapping has been a fundamental step in setting up efficient preparedness plans in Costa Rica.”

By 2100, even without climate change, damages from weather-related hazards may triple to US$185 billion annually, and factoring in climate change could push costs even higher. In the case of tropical cyclones it would add another US$28-68 billion, says the report.

"The report clearly shows that more can be done to take full advantage of many technological advances in predicting weather through investing in hydro-meteorological services. The most vulnerable countries in particular require strengthening of their observing networks and infrastructure to establish effective early warning systems to warn their population against disasters," said Michel Jarraud, World Meteorological Organization Secretary-General.

The report, which has attracted unparalleled praise from six Nobelists, calls for governments to ensure that new infrastructure does not introduce new risk. Locating infrastructure out of harm’s way is one way to achieve this. Where that may not be possible, the report proposes low-cost, multipurpose infrastructure, like the schools that also act as cyclone shelters in Bangladesh, or the roadways that double up as drains in Malaysia.

“This thought-provoking report demonstrates that prevention doesn’t always have to be costly. Perhaps this is why it has been successful in bringing high-level policy-makers and the disaster management community together,” said Dato’ Seri Mohamed Nazri Bin Abdul Aziz, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department of Malaysia, at the event. “Integrating disaster prevention with development planning and strategies is crucial. At the end of the day, development is about preventing disasters, and preventing disasters is about development.”

The report was funded by the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, a partnership of 35 countries and six international organizations, including the World Bank, which helps developing countries reduce their vulnerability to natural hazards and adapt to climate change.

For more information please go to: www.worldbank.org/preventingdisasters

Please direct enquiries and requests for interviews to Anita Gordon agordon@worldbank.org, mobile: +41 76 219 2565 or +1 202 436 4791.

GAR 2011: National drought policies wanted

GLOBAL: National drought policies wanted

Photo: UNDP
Droughts remain a hidden risk

JOHANNESBURG, 11 May 2011 (IRIN) - Few countries have the right policies in place to manage the impact of droughts, which over the last century have claimed millions of lives, says the Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2011 (GAR 2011). But this could be about to change.

Mannava Sivakumar, director of the Agricultural Meteorology Division at the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), who contributed to the chapter on droughts in the GAR 2011, wants countries to develop their own policies to tackle a climate event that remains poorly understood.

“A national drought policy will not only institutionalize the need for effective monitoring and setting up of early warning systems, it will empower a poor farmer affected by a drought to demand safety nets to protect him,” said Sivakumar.

Australia was so far the only country that had put in place a national drought policy to reduce risk “by developing better awareness and understanding” of droughts and the underlying causes of vulnerability of the communities exposed to them.

Risk identification and early warning are the priority areas identified by the Hyogo Framework of Action, a 10-year global policy approved by countries in 2005 to reduce disaster risks.

Whenever a natural hazard event such as a drought occurs, governments and donors have followed the set format of impact assessments, response, recovery and reconstruction, with little attention to risk management to “reduce future impacts, and lessen the need for government intervention in the future”, Sivakumar pointed out.

“The ultimate goal [of a national drought policy] is to create more drought-resilient societies,” he said. A drought policy would make it mandatory to provide safety nets such as insurance, and would sit well with developing countries' climate change adaptation plans. Droughts are expected to become more intense and frequent as the impact of climate change unfolds.

Arid events have affected more lives than any other single physical hazard. The GAR 2011 highlighted a range of problems in dealing with droughts, the biggest being that they are poorly understood. “You cannot say with a certainty when a drought begins or when it ends”, said Sivakumar.

2010 Disasters which affected the most people
EventsCountryNumbers of people
(in millions)
Flood, May-AugustChina134
Flash flood, July-AugustPakistan20.4
Flood, October-DecemberThailand, Cambodia9
Drought, March-AugustThailand6.5
Flood, June-AugustChina6
Earthquake, JanuaryHaiti3.9
Flood, SeptemberIndia3.3
Earthquake, FebruaryChile2.7
Drought, February-DecemberSomalia2.4
Flood, April-DecemberColombia2.2
Source: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) Université catholique de Louvain - Brussels, Belgium

This has been partly due to the limitations of the indices used to measure dry periods. In 2010, countries decided on the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), which could alert them to the onset of a drought two to three weeks after it started and prompt them to plan relief.

The SPI uses average rainfall over a period of at least 30 years as a variable to develop an early warning scale. A drought begins when the SPI is continuously negative for two to three weeks, and ends when the numbers turn positive.

Most nations have enough meteorological stations to measure rainfall. “There are very few countries that have problems with data, such asSomalia, which has been dealing with years of conflict,” said Sivakumar, but there are plans afoot to get Somalia, who is a member of the WMO, to set up automated weather stations.

To develop a national drought policy, the factors that heighten risk, increase vulnerability and broaden exposure need to be identified. As there are no credible global drought risk models, the GAR 2011 commissioned case studies around the world to identify some of the drivers that could turn a drought hazard into a disaster.

Climate variability and change, poverty, increasing demand for water as more and more people move to urban areas, bad management of soil and water; and weak or ineffective governance are among the factors that can escalate risk.

One of the most interesting examples of inappropriate management of soil and water presented in the report was Saudi Arabia’s policy in the 1970s to become self-sufficient in wheat production. By the early 1990s it had become the world’s sixth largest wheat producer, but this success came at a price - it drained the country’s aquifers, considerably expanding its exposure to risk. The policy was abandoned and Saudi Arabia now intends to depend completely on imported wheat by 2016.


http://cdrn.org.in/show.detail.asp?id=21756

WMO plans to hold a series of meetings of experts during 2011, ahead of a high-level summit on national drought policy in December 2012.

Monday, May 9, 2011

Kelloggs Corporate Responsibility Report: Watch the Salt!

Corporate Responsibility














Kellogg Company is committed to building a stronger business while acting responsibly toward our customers and consumers, our employees, our communities and the environment. As part of this commitment, we are pleased to release our third global Corporate Responsibility Report. The report provides a comprehensive update of our company's progress and performance in four key areas: marketplace, workplace, environment and community.

For this report, we used the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G3 Guidelines, which provide a recommended framework and indicators for reporting. We are reporting at a GRI-checked application level of "B." The GRI chart may be accessed at right.

We welcome feedback at corporateresponsibility@kellogg.com. For every person who submits feedback in 2011, Kellogg Company will make a one-time donation of $5 to the Global FoodBanking Network – up to $10,000.

2010 Corporate Responsibility Report


Previous CR Reports2009 CR Report2009 Executive Summary2009 Executive Summary - Spanish (Mexico)2009 Executive Summary - French (Canada)

2008 CR Report2008 Executive Summary

Contact Us/Feedback

Your feedback will help us improve our future reporting, and we welcome your comments and opinions. E-mail us at:corporateresponsibility@kellogg.com

AMD's 2010 Annual Corporate Responsibility Report -The Process And Aftermath

AMD's 2010 Annual Corporate Responsibility Report -The Process And Aftermath

AMD’s 16th annual Corporate Responsibility Report has now been published. While this is a significant milestone for AMD, for me personally it was a plunge into the corporate responsibility (CR) world after many years of working in environmental management.

The environmental field is largely controlled by regulations, and a significant part of my career was focused on compliance with these regulations. This work is very disciplined and based on well understood mandates, standards and management systems. While there are a few regulations focused on CR – certain countries have different levels of mandatory CR reporting requirements for labor, social and environmental issues – CR is currently largely voluntary and driven by the companies themselves.

AMD is a company with a long history of “doing the right thing.” Because of this culture and my history with the company, the transition to my new role in corporate responsibility was a little easier. What was most challenging was gaining fluency across diverse areas of the organization and seeking to bring them together with a common purpose. This role requires education on almost every aspect of the business and called on me to communicate – or translate – our CR message into the particular language of each group.

For example, the goals for the supply management team might be to procure the best quality material, at the lowest cost, from a consistent and reliable supplier who can meet our complex specifications. So, when I propose adding a few more criteria for CR, the first response may be “what does this have to do with me?” That’s when the education process kicks-in: defining CR in terms supply management understands, such as the potential for supply interruption due to conflict minerals concerns or labor issues.

The next response from the supply manager is, “okay, I know what you mean now and I understand why it is important to me, but I do not have a process in place to manage this.” Now to the process development portion of my new job; collaborating with subject matter experts to determine what existing systems may already be in place and could be extended to meet the CR challenge, or if new systems are required. Lastly, the conversation may go this way: “okay, I know what you mean, I can see how to do this, but it will require X number of full time people to implement, plus the supplier will incur an additional cost that will be passed on to AMD.”

At this point it might feel really good to say “too bad, just do it.” While corporate responsibility has support from the highest management level at AMD, such a response is not appropriate and counter to our corporate culture. To be effective, CR must be a shared value and implementation should be managed by the appropriate business units throughout our company. Unlike environmental regulations that come with a mandate, we must come together to articulate the business value and design the most efficient process for our company. As I have quickly learned, sometimes this may come down to a simple realization that the goals are “in-line with our company values,” which can be loosely translated into the often overused phrase “it is the right thing to do.”

Here are my top takeaways from this year’s CR reporting experience.

1. While the CR practitioner may have executive support, they typically have little direct control or authority in the areas they must represent. Nonetheless, the job is to lead through influence. This makes the tactical work of implementing needed processes more difficult, but ultimately more effective.

2. Corporate responsibility spans every area of AMD’s operations – from research and development (energy efficiency focus), government relations (ethics and fair and open competition), HR (diversity, labor issues, employee relations), training (CR training and recruiting), supply management (conflict minerals, electronics industry code of conduct) and the list goes on. To be effective in this role, a CR practitioner needs to be curious, flexible and able to learn and adapt quickly!

3. Many of the results are intangible. Environmental management is far more objective and can be measured in terms of compliance or emissions. Because corporate responsibility is so broad, it can be harder to measure.

4. Success in CR takes passion and a culture of communication and collaboration. While some companies may invest lots of money in CR and achieve noticeable recognition, to truly reap the benefits of CR, key business units must be committed and employees must be engaged.

So what’s next? Now that the report is published, I will turn my attention to educating our employees about its content. Do they know that their colleague Randall Pinney helps build schools and water wells in Afghanistan and Nicaragua? Do they know that the AMD Foundation donated well over a million dollars to preserve open spaces and funds the AMD Changing the Game initiative which teaches important STEM skills to young people? Do they know that AMD provides the opportunity for assistance related to eldercare, childcare, and other work/life balance issues to each and every employee? And lastly but certainly not least important, how does every AMD employee’s day-to-day work feed AMD’s culture of CR, and how can they extend that into their lives outside the office? I can tell every AMD employee worldwide with confidence from my own experience that living our CR values can enrich their lives, at work, at home, and wherever their adventures take them.

Heather O’Cleirigh is the Corporate Responsibility Manager at AMD. Her postings are her own opinions and may not represent AMD’s positions, strategies, or opinions. Links to third party sites, and references to third party trademarks, are provided for convenience and illustrative purposes only. Unless explicitly stated, AMD is not responsible for the contents of such links, and no third party endorsement of AMD or any of its products is implied.

Source :- http://blogs.amd.com/corporate/2011/05/03/amd%E2%80%99s-2010-annual-corporate-responsibility-report-%E2%80%93-the-process-and-aftermath/

http://www.amd.com/us/Documents/2010_CRR.pdf

http://cdrn.org.in/show.detail.asp?id=21738

AMD's 2010 Annual Corporate Responsibility Report -The Process And Aftermath

AMD's 2010 Annual Corporate Responsibility Report -The Process And Aftermath

AMD’s 16th annual Corporate Responsibility Report has now been published. While this is a significant milestone for AMD, for me personally it was a plunge into the corporate responsibility (CR) world after many years of working in environmental management.

The environmental field is largely controlled by regulations, and a significant part of my career was focused on compliance with these regulations. This work is very disciplined and based on well understood mandates, standards and management systems. While there are a few regulations focused on CR – certain countries have different levels of mandatory CR reporting requirements for labor, social and environmental issues – CR is currently largely voluntary and driven by the companies themselves.

AMD is a company with a long history of “doing the right thing.” Because of this culture and my history with the company, the transition to my new role in corporate responsibility was a little easier. What was most challenging was gaining fluency across diverse areas of the organization and seeking to bring them together with a common purpose. This role requires education on almost every aspect of the business and called on me to communicate – or translate – our CR message into the particular language of each group.

For example, the goals for the supply management team might be to procure the best quality material, at the lowest cost, from a consistent and reliable supplier who can meet our complex specifications. So, when I propose adding a few more criteria for CR, the first response may be “what does this have to do with me?” That’s when the education process kicks-in: defining CR in terms supply management understands, such as the potential for supply interruption due to conflict minerals concerns or labor issues.

The next response from the supply manager is, “okay, I know what you mean now and I understand why it is important to me, but I do not have a process in place to manage this.” Now to the process development portion of my new job; collaborating with subject matter experts to determine what existing systems may already be in place and could be extended to meet the CR challenge, or if new systems are required. Lastly, the conversation may go this way: “okay, I know what you mean, I can see how to do this, but it will require X number of full time people to implement, plus the supplier will incur an additional cost that will be passed on to AMD.”

At this point it might feel really good to say “too bad, just do it.” While corporate responsibility has support from the highest management level at AMD, such a response is not appropriate and counter to our corporate culture. To be effective, CR must be a shared value and implementation should be managed by the appropriate business units throughout our company. Unlike environmental regulations that come with a mandate, we must come together to articulate the business value and design the most efficient process for our company. As I have quickly learned, sometimes this may come down to a simple realization that the goals are “in-line with our company values,” which can be loosely translated into the often overused phrase “it is the right thing to do.”

Here are my top takeaways from this year’s CR reporting experience.

1. While the CR practitioner may have executive support, they typically have little direct control or authority in the areas they must represent. Nonetheless, the job is to lead through influence. This makes the tactical work of implementing needed processes more difficult, but ultimately more effective.

2. Corporate responsibility spans every area of AMD’s operations – from research and development (energy efficiency focus), government relations (ethics and fair and open competition), HR (diversity, labor issues, employee relations), training (CR training and recruiting), supply management (conflict minerals, electronics industry code of conduct) and the list goes on. To be effective in this role, a CR practitioner needs to be curious, flexible and able to learn and adapt quickly!

3. Many of the results are intangible. Environmental management is far more objective and can be measured in terms of compliance or emissions. Because corporate responsibility is so broad, it can be harder to measure.

4. Success in CR takes passion and a culture of communication and collaboration. While some companies may invest lots of money in CR and achieve noticeable recognition, to truly reap the benefits of CR, key business units must be committed and employees must be engaged.

So what’s next? Now that the report is published, I will turn my attention to educating our employees about its content. Do they know that their colleague Randall Pinney helps build schools and water wells in Afghanistan and Nicaragua? Do they know that the AMD Foundation donated well over a million dollars to preserve open spaces and funds the AMD Changing the Game initiative which teaches important STEM skills to young people? Do they know that AMD provides the opportunity for assistance related to eldercare, childcare, and other work/life balance issues to each and every employee? And lastly but certainly not least important, how does every AMD employee’s day-to-day work feed AMD’s culture of CR, and how can they extend that into their lives outside the office? I can tell every AMD employee worldwide with confidence from my own experience that living our CR values can enrich their lives, at work, at home, and wherever their adventures take them.

Heather O’Cleirigh is the Corporate Responsibility Manager at AMD. Her postings are her own opinions and may not represent AMD’s positions, strategies, or opinions. Links to third party sites, and references to third party trademarks, are provided for convenience and illustrative purposes only. Unless explicitly stated, AMD is not responsible for the contents of such links, and no third party endorsement of AMD or any of its products is implied.

Source :- http://blogs.amd.com/corporate/2011/05/03/amd%E2%80%99s-2010-annual-corporate-responsibility-report-%E2%80%93-the-process-and-aftermath/

http://www.amd.com/us/Documents/2010_CRR.pdf

http://cdrn.org.in/show.detail.asp?id=21738