Showing posts with label disaster risk reduction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disaster risk reduction. Show all posts

Monday, December 19, 2011

Community-based Climate Change Action Grants

Disasters make it the year of living dangerously




AUSTRALIA: With one foot injured, a man makes it to his car so he candrive out of floodwaters at Depot Hill in Rockhampton, Queensland, onJan 6. Daniel Munoz / Reuters



JAPAN: Residents of Rikuzentakata, Iwate prefecture, salvagebelongings eight days after their homes were ruined by theearthquake and tsunami on March 11.


Asia-Pacific region is fast becoming vulnerableto climate change, Karl Wilson reports fromSydney.
It has been a year of devastation and wreckagefor the region, and a year of warning about thedangers of climate change.
The impending cost of inaction could becatastrophic for both human beings andeconomies, experts say.
In 2011, the Asia-Pacific region was hit by someof the worst natural disasters in living memory,leaving thousands of people dead, millionshomeless and wreaking havoc on domesticeconomies.
Floods swamped large parts of easternAustralia and Thailand, while Japan and NewZealand experienced their worst earthquakesever. Prolonged droughts and floods causedhavoc in central and eastern China, with the Yangtze River basin suffering from both droughtand severe flood.
Natural disasters in 2010 caused $109 billion in economic damage - three times more than in2009, according to the United Nations. This year that figure will be much higher.
Damage from the earthquake and tsunami that destroyed much of northeast Japan in Marchcost in excess of $300 billion. The Australian floods in January cost the economy around $30billion, and the February earthquake that destroyed much of Christchurch on New Zealand'sSouth Island left a damage bill topping $20 billion.
The full economic cost of the recent floods in Thailand is still being calculated, but it is expectedto run into the tens of billions of dollars.
It will get worse
While Asia is no stranger to natural disasters, scientists say more extreme weather-relateddisasters are in store - droughts, floods and typhoons - owing to climate change astemperatures increase.
At a recent seminar on migration and global warming held at the Asian Development Bank's(ADB) headquarters in Manila, delegates were told that "the worst is yet to come". The UnitedNations and the World Bank have echoed similar warnings.
If climate change is not addressed now, the ADB said, it will severely hit the region'sdevelopment and affect programs to cut poverty.
"Global warming is likely to cause rice yield potential to decline by up to 50 percent on averageby 2100, compared to 1990, in Vietnam, Thailand, the Philippines and Indonesia, and a largepart of the dominant forest or woodland could be replaced by tropical savanna and shrub withlow or no carbon sequestration potential," an ADB study said.
It warned that the potential economic cost of inaction will be huge.
"If the world continues 'business-as-usual' emissions trends, the cost to these countries eachyear could equal a loss of 6.7 percent of their combined gross domestic product by 2100, morethan twice the world average," the ADB said.
Dennis de la Torre of the Philippines Climate Commission said the country can expect meantemperatures "in all areas of the Philippines to rise by 0.9 degrees C to 1.1 degrees C in 2020and by 1.8 to 2.2 degrees C by 2050". The Philippines is often referred to as Typhoon Alleybecause it is the first country in Southeast Asia to be hit by typhoons and other tropical stormsas they barrel in over the Pacific Ocean. The country is poor, so the impact on the livelihood ofmillions each year is significant.
"The Philippines, as an archipelagic nation, is one of the most vulnerable to climate change.The country ranks No 1 in the world in terms of vulnerability to typhoons and third in terms ofpeople exposed to such seasonal events," De la Torre said.
He quoted a recent Climate Change Vulnerability Index, released by the global risk advisoryfirm Maple-croft, as saying the Philippines ranks sixth among 16 countries in the world asextremely vulnerable to climate change.
'Most vulnerable'
The ADB, in a study on climate change and its impact on Southeast Asia, has said severalfactors contribute to the region's susceptibility to climate change.
Southeast Asia's 563 million people, who rely heavily on farming, are concentrated alongcoastlines that total 173,251 kilometers. An increase in extreme weather and forest fires arisingfrom climate change jeopardizes vital export industries that account for more than 40 percent ofemployment and about 11 percent of GDP.
"The region is highly vulnerable to droughts, floods and tropical cyclones associated withwarming. Its high economic dependence on natural resources and forestry - as one of theworld's biggest providers of forest products - also puts it at risk," the ADB study said.
"Rapid economic growth and structural transformation in Southeast Asia helped lift millions outof extreme poverty in recent decades. But poverty remains high and the poor are the mostvulnerable to climate change."
The ADB said mean temperature increased by 0.1-0.3 degrees C each decade from 1951 to2000, rainfall trended downward from 1960 to 2000 and sea levels rose 1-3 millimeters a year.
Heat waves, droughts, floods and tropical cyclones have been more intense and frequent,causing extensive damage to property, assets and human life.
Recorded floods and storms have risen dramatically, particularly in the Philippines, increasingfrom just under 20 in the 1960s to nearly 120 by 2000-08, the study said.
It warned that the region is likely to suffer more from climate change than the world average, ifno action is taken. In its projection, the annual mean temperature will rise 4.8 degrees C onaverage by 2100 from 1990.
"Mean sea level is projected to rise by 70 cm during the same period. Indonesia, Thailand andVietnam are expected to experience increasingly drier weather conditions in the next 20 to 30years, although this trend is likely to reverse by the middle of this century," the study said.
Not enough planning
The World Bank said the Asia-Pacific region is the most disaster-prone region on Earth,accounting for more than 40 percent of the world's disasters and 65 percent of the peopleaffected. From 1970 to 2010, the bank said, natural disasters resulted in more than 3.3 milliondeaths globally and left damage in excess of $2.3 trillion.
The ADB has warned that Asia, home to three-fifths of humanity, has by far the highestpopulation density of any continent and the world's largest percentage of people living inpoverty. As the region undergoes massive social and economic change, more people aremigrating to urban centers along coastal areas, making them more vulnerable to harshweather.
While wealthy countries such as Australia, Japan and New Zealand have the infrastructure tocope with major natural disasters, countries like Thailand are caught totally unprepared.
Vinod Thomas, a senior vice-president of the World Bank, said that about 50 developingcountries face recurrent earthquakes, mudslides, floods, hurricanes and droughts, yet many ofthem do not seem to recognize they will recur. "Despite all these calamities, countries are stillnot fully prepared to respond adequately when disasters hit them," he said.
"External agencies often do not acknowledge these risks as a systematic threat to theirassistance. For example, almost half of the countries borrowing from the World Bank fordisaster response did not mention disaster prevention in their development plans. Thissituation must change.
"If we are ready to invest sizable funds to establish mechanisms to withstand financial crises, weneed to do the same with the escalating hazards of nature," Thomas said. "Once the tragedydrops off newspapers' front pages, international donors, like the countries, find it hard to stayengaged with prevention efforts. This also means that the world's attention will no longer befixed on natural disasters until the next big one hits us."
Earthquake zones
Asian and Pacific countries have also a high vulnerability to the impact of disasters apart fromthose related to weather. A number of countries sit on the so-called Pacific Ring of Fire - thefault line that runs round the Pacific basin from Japan to New Zealand and along the west coastof the Americas and is responsible for much of the volcanic and earthquake activity.
With increasing urbanization, migration patterns and population growth, people are occupyinghigh-risk areas in greater numbers than ever, increasing their vulnerability to disaster impacts,the World Bank has said.
Natural disasters affect the economy immediately and directly, as well as having a long-termimpact. In most disasters, the bulk of immediate damage comes from destroyed assets such asbuildings, infrastructure, inventories and crops.
Disasters do not respect borders or distinguish between income levels, no matter how differentthe effects of disasters on human lives could be.
That could be the first and most important lesson from 2011.
Write to the reporter at karlwilson@chinadailyapac.com.




Read in detail at :- http://cdrn.org.in/show.detail.asp?id=23005

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Joint efforts to reduce disaster risks

Joint efforts to reduce disaster risks

US Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue (2nd R), US Pacific Command Chief of Staff Rear Admiral Robin Watters (3rd R), US agency of International Development Assistant Administrator Nancy Lindborg(3rd L), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Director of External Affairs Andy Winer (2nd L) and University of Hawaii PresidentMRC Greenwood, signing the joint statement at the Sheraton Waikiki. Picture: BT/Goh De No

Sunday, November 13, 2011

THE public and private sectors signed a joint statement of intent at Apecto strengthen regional disaster risk reduction and resilience, following US Secretary of State's High-Level Policy Dialogue on Disaster Resiliency yesterday.

The Asia-Pacific Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilient Collaboration joint statement, which was signed by nine organisations at the Sheraton Waikiki, intends to use public private partnership as means to help save lives, ensure economic vitality, and enhance human well-being across the region.

The members also urged more organisations from Apec members to get on-board with their effort to reduce disaster risks and increase resilience in the the Asia-Pacific region.

MRC Greenwood, System President of the University of Hawaii (UH), said that UH has offered to host this initiative, and believed that with its strong connections (and location) throughout the region, will be able to make it as home of the initiative.

"In Japan, regardless of how prepared or how strong, the importance there is the ability to sustain and recover after a disaster," she said.

The US Agency for International Development's (USAID) Assistant Administrator Nancy Lindborg said that the initiative was important especially because of disasters happening more frequently in this densely populated world, especially in the Asia-Pacific region.

"This won't eliminate disaster, but it helps continuous progress on how to address them," she said, adding, "We have also launched an online tool on how to map and respond to disasters."

Thomas Donohue, president of the US Chamber of Commerce, said with the private sector on board, they bring along a unique capability and resource to the table.

He said that with a 24-7 news cycle, more disasters are being seen, so the greater question is whether more disasters are happening, and why.

Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton, said that yesterday, she chaired two high-level policydialogues on critical issues, disaster resilience and open governance, and held bi-lateral meetings with several countries including China, Japan, Australia, Indonesia, and Vietnam.

"We discussed a full range of issues from our economic partnerships to our security challenges to our shared humanitarian concerns. In particular, I expressed solidarity with our ally and friend, Thailand, as it contends with the worse flooding in the nation's history," she said.

A release from Apec ministers and senior government officials on the High Level Policy Dialogue on Disaster Resiliency, said that bearing the earthquake and tsunami on March 11 in Japan; the wildfires, typhoons and tornadoes in the region; and recent floods in Thailand, is a reminder that the region is highly prone to impacts of natural disasters.

The statement added that Apec, through its strong networks in the business sector, has a comparative advantage in encouraging greater private sector participation in disaster preparedness and resiliency efforts.

The Brunei Times



Source:- http://www.bt.com.bn/news-asia/2011/11/13/joint-efforts-reduce-disaster-risks

Friday, July 8, 2011

Future Development Must Be Centred Around Risk

Future Development Must Be Centred Around Risk


Around 20% of the Earth is at risk from at least one natural hazard and more than half the world’s six billion plus population is exposed. In a matter of minutes, at least one hazard can change the world they know. Only through incorporating risk into development planning can we start to reduce this exposure.

In general, the poorest are the most disproportionally affected by disasters. Poorer countries cannot absorb repeated disaster costs. In the wake of Hurricane Mitch in 1998, Honduras’ President, Carlos Roberto Flores said damages totaling US$6 billion had destroyed 50 years of progress. Following the Indus River floods in Pakistan, the provincial Punjabi Authority allocated most of the development budget to disaster response with little likelihood of replenishment. Essentially, these losses nullify investments made by poorer countries to achieve the Millennium Development Goals.

Indeed, the costs of disasters are challenging the very basis of investments. The earthquake in Haiti completely devastated one of the world’s poorest countries. The Pakistan floods disrupted economic growth, agricultural production, and cost around US$12 billion. The Great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011 caused at least US$300 billion in damage; floods in Australia in 2010 cost US$10 billion; while an earthquake in the same year in New Zealand cost upward of US$5.5 billion. And cities with fast growing populations in hazard prone areas will incur larger costs to pay for the damage and losses that will occur with increasing frequency.

Yet it is not just the costs of a major disaster exposed by the media. From 1989 to 2010, 19 countries reported the destruction of 63,667 schools, 4,873 health facilities with damage to 73,000 kilometres of roads, 3,605 municipal water systems, 4,400 sewer systems and 6,980 power installations. An average of 68% of the damage was caused by frequently occurring, low severity extensive disasters.

Given these facts it is surprising very few countries have public investment budgets that include risk-criteria. Moreover, the international community has yet to fully recognize that if global, sustained and equitable development is to be achieved, then disaster reduction, climate change adaptation and poverty eradication must shape future development plans whether in energy, water or other public goods.

The 2011 Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction, the 2011 Global Risk Assessment Report “Revealing Risk, Redefining Development” and the Mid-term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action (2011) all highlighted the absence of risk sensitive development strategies. The 2,600 participants at the Platform representing billions of people were unified in the conviction that now is the turning point for concrete action to manage disaster and climate risk.

The goal therefore is to protect development investments and lives. Risk reduction’s inclusion in national development plans, especially in hazard zones, should be an informed choice. The recent endorsement by the Maldives’ Parliament for the world’s first Strategic National Action Plan, which integrates risk reduction and climate change adaptation, is a landmark achievement. Peru, Indonesia and Viet Nam are also making rapid progress to mitigate against the risks to their development. Others will surely follow once the decision is made to reduce the impact of climate and disaster risk.

The business and corporate community understands risk management and will without doubt support government action to reduce risk. Enterprises sensitized to risk recognize the need to protect supply lines as well as to ensure healthy workforces and customers who continue to consume. This requires protection of physical assets, infrastructure and the health as well as welfare of people.

Many leaders are realizing the enormous costs that disasters incur. President Yudhoyono of Indonesia has agreed to be a Global Champion for Risk Reduction. Senator Loren Lagarda of the Philippines has been a tireless advocate and promoter of risk reduction. The Honourable Abdou Sane, a Senegalese Parliamentarian, is a West African Champion of risk reduction, and Mayor Marcelo Eberard of Mexico City is a Champion for resilient cities.

We know what to do to reduce the impacts of natural hazards; an integrated approach to development planning, like that of the Maldives, that encompasses climate change adaptation and risk reduction. Climate change begets natural hazards – risk reduction lessens disaster impacts. The latter is a development imperative that will help to anticipate events well in advance, reduce the suffering of millions, and help avert catastrophes that warrant massive humanitarian responses.



Source :- http://climate-l.iisd.org/guest-articles/future-development-must-be-centred-around-risk/


Thursday, March 24, 2011

Statement by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction on World Meteorological Day

Statement by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction on World Meteorological Day




Type:Statements & speeches
Date:23 Mar 2011
Source:United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat (UNISDR)
Language:English



Geneva, Switzerland - Today’s observance of World Meteorological Day with its theme of “Climate for You”, highlights the direct link between climate change, weather variability and the increase in the frequency as well as severity of weather related natural hazards.

The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is a strong and active partner of the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR) whose critical role and work are central to reducing the impact of disasters. These efforts are key contributions to human, social and economic safety. We fully support WMO’s long-term objective: that of halving by 2019, the 1994-2003 ten-year average of deaths caused by disasters of meteorological and hydrological origin.

The risks presented by climate variability as well as the severity and frequency of disaster impacts, are key themes in the Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) -- the world’s only blueprint for staving off losses caused by natural hazards. Yet, the earthquakes and floods in Haiti, New Zealand, Pakistan and Australia in 2010 and early 2011, as well as the devastating tsunami in Japan this month, are some recent and harsh reminders of the debilitating effects of disasters on lives and the socio-economic fabric of societies. More is required, for example, in the area of early warning mechanisms and on strengthening national institutions for weather forecasting services.

Our recently launched report, ‘Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters’, reviews the last five years' progress on strengthening disaster risk reduction. The report underscores areas where work is most needed to ensure that gains from the past five years translate into substantial reduction of disaster losses in the following five and beyond. The report contains the views of governments themselves, expressed to other governments, about the kinds of immediate actions they and other stakeholders must take to produce tangible progress on the HFA by 2015. We are convinced of the importance of this report, and hope that it will inspire action around the world.

In this context, the Third Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction, a high-level event scheduled from 8-13 May 2011 (in about 45 days) in Geneva, will actively reach out to a new and diverse range of leaders and decision-makers to stimulate commitment and concrete investment in disaster risk reduction.

Margareta Wahlström
Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction


(Photo credit: WMO)



Available here
World Meteorological Day 2011 - Climate for you
Related Links
Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015 Mid-Term Review
The Third Session of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Statement by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction on the 11 March Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan

Type:News briefs
Date:18 Mar 2011
Source:United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat (UNISDR)
Language:English



The United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) expresses its profound regret at the loss of life and the immense damage inflicted upon the people of Japan on 11 March 2011, when an earthquake and tsunami struck the north-eastern coast of the country. We take this opportunity to offer our deepest condolences to all who have lost family members and homes as well as those who still await information about missing relatives and friends.

While it may be hard to draw solace from the current state of affairs, perhaps we can take some measure of comfort in knowing that even more lives would have been lost, and damage been more widespread, had the Japanese Government not made disaster risk reduction a high priority over a long period of time. As early as 1896, the authorities laid down the roots for reducing disaster risk in Tohoku, following the Meiji Sanriku Earthquake and Tsunami. Over the years, awareness has evolved into stringent building codes and stronger buildings that sway and slide above the ground rather than crumble. Such precautions, based on lessons learned, have been translated into wider national disaster risk reduction plans, which totaled some US$25 billion in 2008.

Nevertheless, the intensity and scale of the 11 March earthquake of 9.0, and the ensuing tsunami, exceeded the planning parameters foreseen. The crisis that has arisen from the damage to the nuclear power plant gives new impetus to the critical need - plan broadly and inclusively for unique risk-scenarios. Clearly, overall risk mitigation and preparedness planning for critical and vulnerable core socio-economic infrastructure must be given higher priority.
This tsunami tragedy reminds us all that, beyond simulations and drills, it is also important that we as individuals, and in our capacity as professionals, are always conscious of risk as a constant in everyday life. How do we live with it? What do we need to know to better understand our risks? Knowing the answers to questions like these will support resilience.

The Japanese experience once again underscores the value of and the need for comprehensive multi-hazard approaches to risk reduction, particularly as landscape and climate patterns change over time.

UNISDR affirms its solidarity with the people of Japan and pays tribute to their enormous resilience and courage. We also support the Government's continued efforts to build resilient communities; to take inspiration from the bravery of the people facing this catastrophe and; to bring speedy respite to those who still suffer.

Margareta Wahlström
Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction
http://cdrn.org.in/show.detail.asp?id=21572

(Photo credit: Flickr @kalleboo)

Friday, March 11, 2011

To build the resilience of nations and communities to disasters, we need equal and active participation of men and women in disaster risk reduction.

To build the resilience of nations and communities to disasters, we need equal and active participation of men and women in disaster risk reduction.




Type:News briefs
Date:8 Mar 2011
Source:United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat (UNISDR)
Language:English



Disasters affect men and women differently, and so we will continue to lobby for gender-sensitive vulnerability, risk and capacity assessments. Studies show that women’s vulnerabilities during and after disasters is linked to their role and status in society, making women and children 14 times more likely to die than men during a disaster.

At the same time, we will work towards increasing women’s understanding, knowledge and capacity on disaster risk reduction, and of its links with other development sectors. We will continue to encourage governments to invest in discovering women’s needs, so that women are better able to prepare for, and respond to, disasters.

However, advancing gender perspectives and women’s rights is not just a job for women – more men must advocate at a high level for the empowerment of women, and for the incorporation of gender budgeting into national and local development plans.

The United Nations has increased its leadership in gender issues and UN Women has been created for concerted action in promoting gender equality in and outside the United Nations system. For its part, the UNISDR secretariat has the mandate and responsibility for gender mainstreaming in disaster risk reduction, in line with the Hyogo Framework for Action adopted by 168 countries at the World Conference on Disaster Reduction in 2005.

Making disaster risk reduction gender sensitive will secure the equal participation of men and women in policy making and policy implementation in disaster risk reduction, making it possible to achieve disaster-resilient nations and communities. And, as the frequency and impact of climate-related disasters increases, UNISDR is committed to building a culture of prevention that is founded on the specific needs, voices, roles, and potential of women, men, boys, and girls.


***********
Margareta Wahlström
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Disaster Risk Reduction
March 2011


Related Links
UNISDR Publications: Gender and Disaster Risk Reduction

Contact Information
Other Details

UNISDR
9-11 Rue de Varemb
1202 Geneva, Switzerland
Tel: +41 22 917 8908/8907
Fax: +41 22 917 8964

In times of dwindling resources, disaster risk reduction is an easy win

UNISDR

Description
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2011


In times of dwindling resources, disaster risk reduction is an easy win




Type:Press release
Date:9 Mar 2011
Source:United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat (UNISDR)
Language:English



Geneva, Switzerland – A new report from the United Nations confirms what governments already hear but are slow to believe: that disciplined public sector involvement in “disaster risk reduction” can significantly reduce setbacks brought by hundreds of droughts, earthquakes, wildfires, hurricanes and other hazards that befall the world each year, on average.

Released today, the “Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters,” points out that a majority of countries have roadmaps for creating and safeguarding wealth, but many are lacking capacity. In some cases, there is capacity but no legal basis for coordination among the different government sectors.

“The world needs to hear from its leaders, ‘This fragmentation leads to weakness. The political, economic and social agenda is not complete if we can’t protect our wealth from the next earthquake or storm,’” says Ms. Wahlström, the Secretary-General’s Special Representative for Disaster Risk Reduction. “The report emphasizes that countries need to conduct risk assessments that lead to wiser development plans, to be carried out by institutions that are well-funded, well-coordinated and trustworthy.”

The report, written half-way through the ten-year mandate of the Hyogo Framework, analyses the findings from nine workshops around the world on disaster risk reduction, four online debates involving over 300 participants, six in-depth studies, a literature review and internal reviews conducted by major non-governmental organizations and bilateral and multilateral aid organizations.

Agreed in 2005, the Hyogo Framework for Action is the world’s only blueprint for staving off losses caused by natural hazards, often overshadowed by news on losses from war, unemployment or inflation. The earthquake in Haiti in January 2010 and New Zealand in September 2010 and February 2011, and the floods in Pakistan in July 2010 and in Australia in December 2010 are some recent examples of the devastating effects of disasters on lives and social and economic fabric of the societies.

According to the report, countries that regularly experience disasters have become more safety conscious. Those countries are now trying to ensure that disaster lessons are not forgotten, such as Japan with its National Day of Earthquake Remembrance and National Disaster Risk Reduction Day. Similar examples can be found in Bangladesh, Chile, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Madagascar, Mexico, Mozambique, and Vietnam.

Countries are also more serious about implementing the Hyogo Framework. The number of countries voluntarily reporting on progress through the “HFA Monitor,” developed after the 2005 World Conference on Disaster Reduction in Kobe, has risen since the Framework came into being in 2005. During the first reporting cycle ending in 2007, 27 governments completed reports on HFA implementation. The number grew to 77 during the second reporting cycle, ending in 2009. For the cycle ending in 2011, more than 100 reports have been initiated nationally.

Many countries also have recently enacted laws relating to disaster risk reduction, among them India, Sri Lanka, El Salvador, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and Grenadines, Anguilla (UK), Gambia, Indonesia, Egypt, Philippines, Zambia and Papua New Guinea. The report however notes that countries must strive for “a senior, over-arching authority” that can set policies, be accountable for how policies are carried out and ensure enough funds to sustain work in disaster risk reduction.

Ms. Wahlström cautioned: “We are still far from having empowered individuals adopt a disaster risk reduction approach in their daily lives. We need individuals to demand that development, environmental and humanitarian policies and practices be based on sound risk reduction measures.”

When the Hyogo Framework for Action ends in 2015, a successor framework for disaster risk reduction, was indicated in the report, should be based on “solid, structural links” with sustainable development and climate change international framework agreements.

Said Ms. Wahlström: “This report provides an opportunity to catalyze discussion and focus attention on activities that must be undertaken urgently if we are to achieve the outcome expected in the Hyogo Framework for Action by 2015 and contribute to setting the agenda for the Rio+20 world summit on sustainable development, planned for 2012.”


Available here
Press Release [PDF 26.66 KB]
Download the HFA Mid-Term Review
Related Links
HFA Mid-Term Review on PreventionWeb